“Who Knows Only His Own Generation Remains Always a Child.”
This very interesting and relevant quote by Dr. George Norlin, former president of the University of Colorado, is inscribed over the west entrance of the University’s library where I spent hundreds of hours deep in the library stacks studying late into the night. I have learned to navigate the depths of that library in the dark and with my eyes closed. But when it came to learning and understanding truth, my eyes were then, as they are now, wide open. Learners ask questions and challenge assumptions. Learners have a desire to understand alternative perspectives and become knowledgeable with both sides or perspectives of so called facts. One must understand another’s perspective to have a civil conversation let alone formidable debate. Why do so many college students today simply reciting the boring one-sided opinions and lectures their professors pedantically preach to them? What ever happened to critical thinking, epistemology and disciplined inquiry? What about the merits of considering alternative perspectives while seeking the truth? What is truth and how do we know what we know?
Recently, astronaut Scott Kelly posted a Tweet paraphrasing Winston Churchill. Below is the entire quote in context;
“In War: Resolution,
In Defeat: Defiance,
In Victory: Magnanimity
In Peace: Good Will.”
Kelly was attacked by some who considered the quote offensive. So, Kelly back peddles and apologizes. He says something to the effect, I’ll get educated. Which brings me to the topic of this blog post, grace and learning how to learn. While I find nothing offensive with this quote, I am actually inspired by it, I am trying to understand how it might be offensive to some people? That’s an honest question. You see, I believe, words matter. We are experiencing a division in perception of truth. Grace and truth are interconnected, you can’t have one without the other. What Kelly is responding to is a pressure to conform narrative, not the truth. That narrative, I believe is the social constructivist agenda, that is, to rewrite history, not correct it nor to seek the truth.
If we lose our history, we lose our liberty. This is why the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was so important, it was first and foremost.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Why do so many people think history needs revision? Perhaps it is because, for hundreds of years, churches and universities were the center of the community. These were the places people interacted, learned from each other, shared stories and exchanged goods and services in free markets. The city center and market square were the very places truth and grace intersected as expressed through the First Amendment. This idea, no longer fits with the current spirit of the time (zeitgeist). These days many people see religion as the source of legalism, bigotry and scientific ignorance. However, many more people believe that faith in God expressly and implicitly guarantees individual Liberty, justice and love. It is the very bases for human rights, democracy and American justice system; Jefferson referenced the Jewish and Christian God who made us free–self evident , he proclaimed as reflected in the Declaration of Independence. The founders regarded religion as the duty of the independent and free individual to seek. The constitution assure this as a inalienable right and not a privilege to be tolerated. There’s a big difference.
Learning requires we enter a place I call the “epistemic gap”. This is a place between the known and unknown, the natural and supernatural. Part of this journey involves understanding self in relation with God and His creations. We don’t all think alike. This is a gift, not a curse.
Grace and truth’s perfect union can be cultivated in a community of diverse experiences and worldviews. Grace and truth are integral and cannot be truly understood or experienced as an either/or concept. Truth without grace breeds self-righteousness and legalism. Grace without truth breeds deception and moral compromise. The key to true intellectual and spiritual growth is to integrate these two qualities into life, imitating the Creator.
This is an honest question; how is the above quote offensive? What are your thoughts?