“Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.” Karl Marx
I am a Christian and a fiscal conservative, independent thinker. However, in these tumultuous times, I find it increasingly challenging to express my worldview openly to some of my friends and associates without being shamed by some for my conservative perspective. It’s gotten worse recently I started experiencing disdainful scorn and self-righteous indignation. As a Christian, I am mocked for being foolish and stupid. As a conservative, I am chastise and rebuked for my views on limited government, free market economics, poverty theory and social policy. Have you noticed that thinking critically and having an honest alternative perspective is considered “offensive” and not tolerated by some people? Forget about tolerance, that’s a liberal oxymoron. I don’t want to be merely tolerated. I want to be understood. Have you too felt shunned either in face-to-face encounters or on social media? I believe that we are missing an opportunity to experience community and the goodness that comes from developing intellectually and growing emotionally and spiritually through listening to each other and not talking over one another. This is the meaning of learning. We need each other. My liberal friends have drunk the kool aid of moral relativism where there is no truth, only different perspectives, yet, ironically, they cannot tolerate diverse worldviews or perspectives.
How did we get here?
The deconstruction of everything sacred began with secularizing education a little over a hundred years ago. Thus, we see the beginnings of the secular/sacred divide and normalization of secular humanism. Accordingly, progressive postmodern dualism was ushered in shortly after the founding of scientific labs in Leipzig Germany around 1879, when Thomas H. Huxley organized a small group of German and American scientists, [primarily Gestalt psychologists] who sought to overthrow the cultural dominance of Christianity—particularly the intellectual / theological dominance of the Anglican Church, (Huxley’s grandson penned A Brave New World). Their goal was to secularize society, replacing the Judeo-Christian worldview regarding the laws of nature and nature’s God, with a secular-humanist worldview that recognizes the existence of science alone, as observed in scientific labs. This biased perspective denies the apodictic (absolute) and self-evident Truths of the natural order of things and the Bible endowed by our Creator. Thus, public education today essentially advances a social constructivist agenda. Students are taught that they can rewrite history and socially construct their own realities. This is a lie! But, as I have stated earlier, they have drunk this kool aid and believe it. Nevertheless, as secular humanists, Huxley and his advocates understood they were merely replacing one religion with another, for they described their goal as the establishment of the “church scientific.” A search of the American Humanist Association reveals it is a tax exempt 501(c) (3) religious organization (americanhuminist.org retrieved on 3/14/2012). This has since been changed but the original intent hasn’t. An example of the deconstruction of the spirit of truth and social construction of myth is illustrated in the hyperlink below. At the University of Colorado Boulder, for instance, in place of American Civics, students learn “the people’s history of the United States.” http://www.historyisaweapon.com/zinnapeopleshistory.html.
It is indeed ironic that is was Karl Marx who first said, “…religion is the opiate of the masses” but, it turns out liberal extremism / secular humanism and social constructivism appear to be the opiate of the masses. What are your thoughts? Please opine.